Fundacion Tatiana Catedra etica ambiental UAH Universidad de Alcala
CO2Web Observatorio Online
ALIMENTOS
Alimentos
¿Qué incluyen los cálculos?

Hemos realizado un análisis exhaustivo de las referencias publicadas en la literatura científica sobre la HC del ciclo de vida de los distintos alimentos que consumimos. Puesto que la HC está muy relacionada con el origen del producto (cultivo cercano o muy lejano), el tipo de fabricación (procesos de manipulación desde el cultivo hasta el envasado), y transporte y almacenamiento, el mismo alimento puede dar lugar a valores de HC muy variados. Por eso, cuando hemos encontrado varios cálculos para el mismo grupo, hemos optado por incluir los valores promedio, que al menos dan una idea de la diferencia entre tipo de alimentos, así como los mínimos y máximos, para indicar que puede haber una variación –a veces considerable- según el proceso que hayan seguido. Obviamente, no tiene la misma HC un producto cultivado localmente y procesado en una fábrica alimentada con energía renovable que otro que sea importado y se haya producido con energías de alta emisión.

Dividimos el análisis en una tabla inicial, por grupos de alimentos, y en otras más específicas con cada producto.

Emisiones por grupo de alimentos

(Valores de emisión en kgCO2e/kg de producto)

GRUPO DE ALIMENTO EMISIÓN MEDIA EMISIÓN MÍNIMA EMISIÓN MÁXIMA
VALOR PRODUCTO VALOR PRODUCTO
Aceites y salsas 0,97 0,54 Aceite de Girasol
 1,44 Aceite de oliva
Bebidas 1,67 0,10 Agua embotellada
 7,04 Té (kg)
Carnes 17,19 3,09 Pato
 73,86 Búfalo
Cereales (no procesados) 0,85 0,29 Colza
 2,66 Arroz
Dulces 2,28 0,96 Miel
 4,80 Chocolate con almendras
Frutas frescas 0,91 0,22 Limón y lima
 7,47 Frambuesas y bayas
Frutos secos 1,26 0,43 Avellana
 1,74 Almendras
Hortalizas y legumbres 0,75 0,18 Remolacha
Apio
Cebolla
 3,81 Cacao
Lácteos 4,80 1,34 Leche de vaca
 11,52 Mantequilla
Mariscos 10,48 1,58 Mejillones
 21,24 Langosta
Pescado 6,23 1,10 Sardina
 20,86 Lenguado

Hortalizas y legumbres

(Valores de emisión en kgCO2e/kg de producto)
(Pulsar sobre los valores de emisión para ver el origen de ese dato y el enlace al documento donde se publicó)

GRUPO DE ALIMENTO EMISIÓN MEDIA EMISIÓN MÍNIMA EMISIÓN MÁXIMA
GRUPO DE ALIMENTO EMISIÓN MEDIA EMISIÓN MÍNIMA EMISIÓN MÁXIMA
VALOR LUGAR DE CÁLCULO VALOR LUGAR DE CÁLCULO
Lechuga 0,81 0,13
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suecia 4,73
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK
Espárrago 0,95 0,38
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suiza 2,54
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Australia
Brócoli 0,70 0,37
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suecia 1,73
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Australia
Calabacín 0,87 0,09
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suecia 1,94
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Italia
Pepinos 0,72 0,08
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suecia 1,74
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suiza
Pepinillos 0,72 0,13
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suiza 2,12
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Holanda
Judías 0,60 0,22
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Grecia 1,55
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK
Garbanzos 0,67 0,45
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
USA 0,80
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK
Lentejas 1,03 1,00
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Australia 1,06
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK
Guisantes 0,36 0,20
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suecia 0,51
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK
Zanahorias 0,21 0,04
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suecia 0,50
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suecia
Alcachofas 0,48 0,48
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UE 0,48
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UE
Remolacha 0,18 0,11
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suecia 0,24
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Australia
Coles 0,30 0,12
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suecia 0,42
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suiza
Pimientos 1,08 0,23
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Australia 3,80
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Japón
Apio 0,18 0,18
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Australia 0,18
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Australia
Berenjena 1,30 1,30
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suiza 1,30
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suiza
Ajo 0,57 0,57
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK 0,57
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK
Hongos 0,80 0,06
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Australia 1,86
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Holanda
Cebolla 0,18 0,06
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suecia 0,37
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK
Patatas 0,20 0,08
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suecia 0,36
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK
Calabaza 0,33 0,15
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Alemania 0,73
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Alemania
Espinacas 0,54 0,18
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suiza 0,91
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Japón
Tomates 1,25 0,17
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España 6,12
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK
Tomate procesado 0,87 0,87
Theurl, M. C., Haberl, H., Erb, K.-H., & Lindenthal, T. (2014). Contrasted greenhouse gas emissions from local versus long-range tomato production Agronomy for Sustainable Development (Vol. 34(3), pp. 593–602).
Italia 0,87
Theurl, M. C., Haberl, H., Erb, K.-H., & Lindenthal, T. (2014). Contrasted greenhouse gas emissions from local versus long-range tomato production Agronomy for Sustainable Development (Vol. 34(3), pp. 593–602).
Italia
Judías verdes 0,63 0,24
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España 1,55
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK
Cacao 3,81 3,81
ADEME (2018). Agribalyse program. French Environment & Energy Management Agency.
Francia 3,81
ADEME (2018). Agribalyse program. French Environment & Energy Management Agency.
Francia

Frutas frescas

(Valores de emisión en kgCO2e/kg de producto)

GRUPO DE ALIMENTO EMISIÓN MEDIA EMISIÓN MÍNIMA EMISIÓN MÁXIMA
GRUPO DE ALIMENTO EMISIÓN MEDIA EMISIÓN MÍNIMA EMISIÓN MÁXIMA
VALOR LUGAR DE CÁLCULO VALOR LUGAR DE CÁLCULO
Manzana 0,36 0,18
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Nueva Zelanda 0,89
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Francia
Albaricoques 0,43 0,43
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UE 0,43
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UE
Aguacate 0,87 0,43
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UE 1,30
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suiza
Plátano 0,79 0,42
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Ecuador 1,37
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Costa Rica
Grosellas 0,84 0,84
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK 0,84
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK
Cerezas 0,34 0,26
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suecia 0,45
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
USA
Uvas 0,41 0,15
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España 0,88
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Japón
Kiwi 0,47 0,28
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Nueva Zelanda 0,83
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Grecia
Limón y lima 0,22 0,18
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Italia 0,26
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Italia
Melón 0,95 0,30
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suiza 1,43
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Italia
Olivas 0,56 0,22
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Italia 0,85
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Italia
Naranjas 0,33 0,18
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Italia 0,59
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España
Melocotón y nectarina 0,54 0,38
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España 0,81
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Japón
Peras 0,27 0,19
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
China 0,34
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
China
Piña 0,72 0,40
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suiza 1,78
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK
Frambuesas y bayas 7,47 7,30
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España 7,70
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK
Fresas 0,89 0,20
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Austria 5,20
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Japón
Sandía 0,38 0,38
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Australia 0,38
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Australia
Mandarinas 0,51 0,51
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UE 0,51
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UE

Frutos secos

(Valores de emisión en kgCO2e/kg de producto)

GRUPO DE ALIMENTO EMISIÓN MEDIA EMISIÓN MÍNIMA EMISIÓN MÁXIMA
GRUPO DE ALIMENTO EMISIÓN MEDIA EMISIÓN MÍNIMA EMISIÓN MÁXIMA
VALOR LUGAR DE CÁLCULO VALOR LUGAR DE CÁLCULO
Arándanos 0,92 0,86
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
USA 0,97
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
USA
Almendras 1,74 0,51
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
USA 3,77
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
USA
Anacardos 1,72 1,37
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Brasil 2,27
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Holanda
Avellana 0,43 0,43
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UE 0,43
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UE
Cacahuetes 0,94 0,80
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
USA 1,33
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Holanda
Pistachos 1,53 0,88
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK 2,17
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
USA
Quinoa 1,15 1,10
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
USA 1,20
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
USA
Nueces 1,62 0,50
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
USA 2,94
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
USA

Cereales

(Valores de emisión en kgCO2e/kg de producto)

GRUPO DE ALIMENTO EMISIÓN MEDIA EMISIÓN MÍNIMA EMISIÓN MÁXIMA
GRUPO DE ALIMENTO EMISIÓN MEDIA EMISIÓN MÍNIMA EMISIÓN MÁXIMA
VALOR LUGAR DE CÁLCULO VALOR LUGAR DE CÁLCULO
Cebada 0,54 0,30
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suecia 0,98
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Noruega
Maíz 0,48 0,41
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España 0,66
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
USA
Mijo 0,47 0,47
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK 0,47
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK
Avena 0,60 0,38
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK 0,87
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suecia
Colza 0,29 0,29
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Australia 0,29
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Australia
Arroz 2,66 0,66
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
USA 5,69
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Tailandia
Centeno 0,37 0,36
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suecia 0,38
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK
Sésamo 0,88 0,88
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK 0,88
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK
Sorgo 0,88 0,88
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK 0,88
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK
Soja 0,58 0,38
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Brasil 0,96
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Brasil
Trigo 0,50 0,18
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Australia 0,80
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK
Pan rallado (trigo) 1,25 1,25
Chuvieco, E.; Burgui, M.; Carrero, I.; Díaz, E.; Labajo, V.; Valor, C. y Jiménez, R. (2018). Cálculo y etiquetado de la huella de carbono en productos alimentarios (pp. 36): Cátedra de Ética Ambiental FTPGB-UAH.
España 1,25
Chuvieco, E.; Burgui, M.; Carrero, I.; Díaz, E.; Labajo, V.; Valor, C. y Jiménez, R. (2018). Cálculo y etiquetado de la huella de carbono en productos alimentarios (pp. 36): Cátedra de Ética Ambiental FTPGB-UAH.
España
Pan de molde (trigo) 1,11 1,11
Espinoza-Orias, N., Stichnothe, H., & Azapagic, A. (2011). The carbon footprint of bread The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (Vol. 16(4), pp. 351–365).
UK 1,11
Espinoza-Orias, N., Stichnothe, H., & Azapagic, A. (2011). The carbon footprint of bread The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (Vol. 16(4), pp. 351–365).
UK
Pan de centeno 0,80 0,80
MFVM (2009)
Dinamarca 0,80
MFVM (2009)
Dinamarca
Harina de trigo 1,10 1,10
MFVM (2009)
Dinamarca 1,10
MFVM (2009)
Dinamarca
Harina de centeno 1,10 1,10
MFVM (2009)
Dinamarca 1,10
MFVM (2009)
Dinamarca

Lácteos

(Valores de emisión en kgCO2e/kg de producto)

GRUPO DE ALIMENTO EMISIÓN MEDIA EMISIÓN MÍNIMA EMISIÓN MÁXIMA
GRUPO DE ALIMENTO EMISIÓN MEDIA EMISIÓN MÍNIMA EMISIÓN MÁXIMA
VALOR LUGAR DE CÁLCULO VALOR LUGAR DE CÁLCULO
Mantequilla 11,52 3,70
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK 25,00
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Austria
Queso 8,86 5,33
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Holanda 16,35
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
USA
Crema 5,32 2,10
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Canadá 7,92
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Austria
Leche de búfala 3,75 2,87
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Italia 5,20
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Italia
Leche de vaca 1,34 0,54
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Noruega 3,26
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Bangladesh
Leche de cabra 1,41 1,41
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Francia 1,41
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Francia
Yogurt 1,37 1,17
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Austria 1,78
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Portugal

Pescados

(Valores de emisión en kgCO2e/kg de producto)

GRUPO DE ALIMENTO EMISIÓN MEDIA EMISIÓN MÍNIMA EMISIÓN MÁXIMA
GRUPO DE ALIMENTO EMISIÓN MEDIA EMISIÓN MÍNIMA EMISIÓN MÁXIMA
VALOR LUGAR DE CÁLCULO VALOR LUGAR DE CÁLCULO
Alfonsino 3,49 3,49
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España 3,49
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España
Rape 12,29 10,43
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España 14,15
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España
Bacalao 3,58 1,58
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Islandia 5,38
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suecia
Anguila 3,88 3,88
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España 3,88
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España
Merluza 8,89 2,14
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España 14,15
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España
Gallo 6,41 1,20
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Dinamarca 11,61
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España
Sardina 1,10 0,78
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España 1,41
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España
Abadejo 2,77 1,20
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suecia 3,84
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Noruega
Pez Espada 12,84 11,44
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España 14,24
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España
Carpa 1,80 1,73
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Indonesia 1,93
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Indonesia
Arenque 1,17 0,98
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Noruega 1,39
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Noruega
Caballa 2,00 0,94
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España 4,50
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España
Salmón 3,76 2,04
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Canadá 8,33
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK
Lubina 3,55 1,91
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Túnez 5,76
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Francia
Tiburón 11,50 11,44
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España 11,56
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España
Lenguado 20,86 20,86
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Dinamarca 20,86
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Dinamarca
Trucha 3,73 1,37
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Alemania 5,95
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
China
Atún 3,78 2,56
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España 6,32
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España
Rodaballo 14,51 9,63
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Francia 19,40
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España
Pescadilla 2,66 1,54
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España 3,79
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España

Mariscos

(Valores de emisión en kgCO2e/kg de producto)

GRUPO DE ALIMENTO EMISIÓN MEDIA EMISIÓN MÍNIMA EMISIÓN MÁXIMA
GRUPO DE ALIMENTO EMISIÓN MEDIA EMISIÓN MÍNIMA EMISIÓN MÁXIMA
VALOR LUGAR DE CÁLCULO VALOR LUGAR DE CÁLCULO
Langosta 21,24 7,62
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Suecia 28,30
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España
Mejillones 1,58 0,28
Chuvieco, E.; Burgui, M.; Carrero, I.; Díaz, E.; Labajo, V.; Valor, C. y Jiménez, R. (2018). Cálculo y etiquetado de la huella de carbono en productos alimentarios (pp. 36): Cátedra de Ética Ambiental FTPGB-UAH.
España 2,54
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Noruega
Pulpo 7,35 7,35
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España 7,35
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España
Langostinos 15,56 5,25
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Tailandia 38,00
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Senegal
Calamares 6,65 6,39
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España 6,91
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España

Carnes

(Valores de emisión en kgCO2e/kg de producto)

GRUPO DE ALIMENTO EMISIÓN MEDIA EMISIÓN MÍNIMA EMISIÓN MÁXIMA
GRUPO DE ALIMENTO EMISIÓN MEDIA EMISIÓN MÍNIMA EMISIÓN MÁXIMA
VALOR LUGAR DE CÁLCULO VALOR LUGAR DE CÁLCULO
Ternera 27,11 10,74
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Holanda 64,00
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Brasil
Búfalo 73,86 48,92
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Sudamérica 100,72
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Sudeste asiático
Pollo 3,91 1,06
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Letonia 9,98
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Australia
Pato 3,09 2,07
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Australia 4,10
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK
Canguro 4,10 4,10
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Australia 4,10
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Australia
Cordero 26,17 10,05
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Australia 56,70
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
España
Cerdo 5,73 2,11
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Letonia 10,25
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Francia
Conejo 4,70 3,82
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Francia 5,58
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Australia
Pavo 6,04 3,34
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Canadá 8,49
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK

Aceites y salsas

(Valores de emisión en kgCO2e/kg de producto)

GRUPO DE ALIMENTO EMISIÓN MEDIA EMISIÓN MÍNIMA EMISIÓN MÁXIMA
GRUPO DE ALIMENTO EMISIÓN MEDIA EMISIÓN MÍNIMA EMISIÓN MÁXIMA
VALOR LUGAR DE CÁLCULO VALOR LUGAR DE CÁLCULO
Aceite de oliva 1,44 1,22
Chuvieco, E.; Burgui, M.; Carrero, I.; D�az, E.; Labajo, V.; Valor, C. y Jim�nez, R. (2018). C�lculo y etiquetado de la huella de carbono en productos alimentarios (pp. 36): C�tedra de �tica Ambiental FTPGB-UAH.
Espa�a 1,67
Chuvieco, E.; Burgui, M.; Carrero, I.; D�az, E.; Labajo, V.; Valor, C. y Jim�nez, R. (2018). C�lculo y etiquetado de la huella de carbono en productos alimentarios (pp. 36): C�tedra de �tica Ambiental FTPGB-UAH.
Espa�a
Aceite de Colza 0,94 0,94
ADEME (2018). Agribalyse program. French Environment & Energy Management Agency.
Francia 0,94
ADEME (2018). Agribalyse program. French Environment & Energy Management Agency.
Francia
Aceite de Girasol 0,54 0,54
ADEME (2018). Agribalyse program. French Environment & Energy Management Agency.
Francia 0,54
ADEME (2018). Agribalyse program. French Environment & Energy Management Agency.
Francia

Bebidas

(Valores de emisión en kgCO2e/kg de producto)

GRUPO DE ALIMENTO EMISIÓN MEDIA EMISIÓN MÍNIMA EMISIÓN MÁXIMA
GRUPO DE ALIMENTO EMISIÓN MEDIA EMISIÓN MÍNIMA EMISIÓN MÁXIMA
VALOR LUGAR DE CÁLCULO VALOR LUGAR DE CÁLCULO
Leche de almendra 0,42 0,39
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
USA 0,44
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
USA
Leche de coco 0,42 0,39
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
USA 0,44
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
USA
Leche de soja 0,88 0,66
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
USA 1,40
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK
Vino tinto 1,49 1,13
Navarro, A., Puig, R., K?l?ç, E., Penavayre, S., & Fullana-i-Palmer, P. (2017). Eco-innovation and benchmarking of carbon footprint data for vineyards and wineries in Spain and France Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 142(4), pp. 1661-1671).
España 1,92
Rinaldi, S., Bonamente, E., Scrucca, F., Merico, M. C., Asdrubali, F., & Cotana, F. (2016). Water and Carbon Footprint of Wine: Methodology Review and Application to a Case Study Sustainability (Vol. 8(7), pp. 621).
Italia
Vino blanco 1,84 1,84
Rinaldi, S., Bonamente, E., Scrucca, F., Merico, M. C., Asdrubali, F., & Cotana, F. (2016). Water and Carbon Footprint of Wine: Methodology Review and Application to a Case Study Sustainability (Vol. 8(7), pp. 621).
Italia 1,84
Rinaldi, S., Bonamente, E., Scrucca, F., Merico, M. C., Asdrubali, F., & Cotana, F. (2016). Water and Carbon Footprint of Wine: Methodology Review and Application to a Case Study Sustainability (Vol. 8(7), pp. 621).
Italia
Cerveza 1,41 1,29
Cimini, A., & Moresi, M. (2018). Mitigation measures to minimize the cradle-to-grave beer carbon footprint as related to the brewery size and primary packaging materials Journal of Food Engineering (Vol. 236, pp. 1-8).
Italia 1,53
Cimini, A., & Moresi, M. (2018). Mitigation measures to minimize the cradle-to-grave beer carbon footprint as related to the brewery size and primary packaging materials Journal of Food Engineering (Vol. 236, pp. 1-8).
Italia
Agua embotellada 0,10 0,10
MFVM (2009)
Dinamarca 0,10
MFVM (2009)
Dinamarca
Refresco carbonatado 0,33 0,15
Amienyo, D., Gujba, H., Stichnothe, H., & Azapagic, A. (2013). Life cycle environmental impacts of carbonated soft drink The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (Vol. 18(1), pp. 77–92).
UK 0,56
Amienyo, D., Gujba, H., Stichnothe, H., & Azapagic, A. (2013). Life cycle environmental impacts of carbonated soft drink The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (Vol. 18(1), pp. 77–92).
UK
Licor alta graduación 2,97 2,07
Hallström, E., Håkansson, N., Åkesson, A., Wolk, A., & Sonesson, U. (2018). Climate impact of alcohol consumption in Sweden Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 201(10) pp. 287-294).
Suecia 3,88
Amienyo, D. (2012). Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment in the UK Beverage Sector. PhD Thesis. School of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Science. University of Manchester. Manchester (UK).
UK
Café (kg) 1,45 1,45
ADEME (2018). Agribalyse program. French Environment & Energy Management Agency.
Francia 1,45
ADEME (2018). Agribalyse program. French Environment & Energy Management Agency.
Francia
Té (kg) 7,04 7,04
Hu, A. H., Chen, C.-H., Huang, L. H., Chung, M.-H., Lan, Y.-C., & Chen, Z. (2019). Environmental Impact and Carbon Footprint Assessment of Taiwanese Agricultural Products: A Case Study on Taiwanese Dongshan Tea Energies. Vol. 12 (138), pp. 1-13.
Taiwan 7,04
Hu, A. H., Chen, C.-H., Huang, L. H., Chung, M.-H., Lan, Y.-C., & Chen, Z. (2019). Environmental Impact and Carbon Footprint Assessment of Taiwanese Agricultural Products: A Case Study on Taiwanese Dongshan Tea Energies. Vol. 12 (138), pp. 1-13.
Taiwan

Dulces y otros

(Valores de emisión en kgCO2e/kg de producto)

GRUPO DE ALIMENTO EMISIÓN MEDIA EMISIÓN MÍNIMA EMISIÓN MÁXIMA
GRUPO DE ALIMENTO EMISIÓN MEDIA EMISIÓN MÍNIMA EMISIÓN MÁXIMA
VALOR LUGAR DE CÁLCULO VALOR LUGAR DE CÁLCULO
Chocolate con almendras 4,80 4,80
Volpe, R., Messineo, S., Volpe, M., & Messineo, A. (2015). Carbon Footprint of Tree Nuts Based Consumer Products Sustainability (Vol. 7(11), pp. 14917-14934).
Italia 4,80
Volpe, R., Messineo, S., Volpe, M., & Messineo, A. (2015). Carbon Footprint of Tree Nuts Based Consumer Products Sustainability (Vol. 7(11), pp. 14917-14934).
Italia
Chocolate con avellanas 3,43 3,43
Volpe, R., Messineo, S., Volpe, M., & Messineo, A. (2015). Carbon Footprint of Tree Nuts Based Consumer Products Sustainability (Vol. 7(11), pp. 14917-14934).
Italia 3,43
Volpe, R., Messineo, S., Volpe, M., & Messineo, A. (2015). Carbon Footprint of Tree Nuts Based Consumer Products Sustainability (Vol. 7(11), pp. 14917-14934).
Italia
Manteca de cacahuete 1,93 1,93
Volpe, R., Messineo, S., Volpe, M., & Messineo, A. (2015). Carbon Footprint of Tree Nuts Based Consumer Products Sustainability (Vol. 7(11), pp. 14917-14934).
Italia 1,93
Volpe, R., Messineo, S., Volpe, M., & Messineo, A. (2015). Carbon Footprint of Tree Nuts Based Consumer Products Sustainability (Vol. 7(11), pp. 14917-14934).
Italia
Crema de avellanas con chocolate 2,81 2,81
Volpe, R., Messineo, S., Volpe, M., & Messineo, A. (2015). Carbon Footprint of Tree Nuts Based Consumer Products Sustainability (Vol. 7(11), pp. 14917-14934).
Italia 2,81
Volpe, R., Messineo, S., Volpe, M., & Messineo, A. (2015). Carbon Footprint of Tree Nuts Based Consumer Products Sustainability (Vol. 7(11), pp. 14917-14934).
Italia
Helado 1,00 1,00
MFVM (2009)
Australia 1,00
MFVM (2009)
Australia
Azúcar 1,00 1,00
MFVM (2009)
Dinamarca 1,00
MFVM (2009)
Dinamarca
Miel 0,96 0,40
Kendall, A.; Yuan, Juhong; Brodt, S.; Kramer, K. J. (2011). Carbon Footprint of U.S. Honey Production and Packing. Report to the National Honey Board. University of California-Davis (USA)/ KJKramer Consulting.
EE.UU. 2,50
Mujica, M.; Blanco, G.; Santalla, E. (2016). Carbon footprint of honey produced in Argentina. Journal of Cleaner Production, 116, 50-60 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.086).
Argentina
Huevos (docena) 1,50 1,30
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
Australia 5,80
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 140(2), pp. 766-783.
UK
Tabaco (gCO2e/cigarrillo) 14,00 14,00
Zafeiridou, M., Hopkins, N. S., & Voulvoulis, N. (2018). Cigarette Smoking: An Assessment of Tobacco’s Global Environmental Footprint Across Its Entire Supply Chain Environmental Science & Technology (Vol. 52(15), pp. 8087-8094).
Global 14,00
Zafeiridou, M., Hopkins, N. S., & Voulvoulis, N. (2018). Cigarette Smoking: An Assessment of Tobacco’s Global Environmental Footprint Across Its Entire Supply Chain Environmental Science & Technology (Vol. 52(15), pp. 8087-8094).
Global

Calcula emisiones para distintos menús

ELIGE PLATOS

kgCO2e

PRIMER PLATO

SEGUNDO PLATO

POSTRE

BEBIDA

TOTAL:

1